Sunday, March 1, 2009
Iran-Syria-Turkey-Iraq power network.
IRNA quoted Parviz Fattah as saying that the energy ministers of the four countries will soon hold a meeting in this regard in Baghdad.
With the power generating capacity of 120,000 MW, the four countries are considered as powerful countries in the world in the field of generating energy.
Fattah went on saying that Iran is establishing two thermal power plants in Iraq one with the neighboring country’s investment and the other one as a joint venture.
Construction of Syria’s Tashrin power plant is another project underway by Iran that has been invested by Syria.
MNA
How is it that Iran is working in collusion with Turkey who is know to be aiding the IDF?
An Interesting Analysis Worthy of Consideration.
The question still remains as to how we stop this re-occurring cycle.
The answer is an evolution into a Socialist economic, and social structure. Capitalism and Industrialism have served their purpose in building the means of production and distribution. Now it is time to use it for the benefit of humankind. Now it is time for us to evolve beyond the Capitalistic, private property mindset
What we need to do...
We are faced with the largest economic crisis since the Great Depression which in turn was the greatest economic crisis since the Great Panic in Lincoln’s time. It seems too easy to blame certain Wall Street, and corporate executives for poor, and irresponsible choices, but these bad practices were only results of the problem we face today.
From WWII until the early Seventies we had seen an exponential growth in industry, per capita production, and in the country’s population as immigrants migrated here for the prospect of jobs with seemingly endless increases in per capita income. The advantage that we had was our being the only nation who emerged from the war with a intact industrial infrastructure.
Several factors were involved in this economic honeymoon to end.
One factor was the reconstruction of the industrial aparatai in Europe. We faced a new and ever growing competition from Europe and Asia, and when they proved able to produce the same products better and more efficiently we were pressed to respond or fail.
We responded in two major ways. One was the incorporation of computers and robotics into industry. The second was the export of manufacturing jobs to third world countries which contained oodles of cheap labor.
In response to the end of per capita income growth, and the rise of the cost of living the American woman entered the workforce in order to increase their household’s income. This only exacerbated the situation as it added more workers in a ever shrinking job market.
As more and more manufacturing jobs left the country, the jobs that remained were mostly retail, and service jobs. Construction became very prevalent in the job market as homes were built en masse.
As we know all too well from our frustrating experiences trying to talk to Pakistani customer service representatives, the service industry followed the example of the manufacturing industries and exported their jobs to foreign countries promising cheaper labor. This was partly due to the advent of twenty-four hour customer service. Many companies have service centers here in America during the day and overseas centers that take care of calls most of us are asleep. No matter what the reason the end result is the same; less jobs for Americans
Another aspect of our economy over the last seventy-five years that has contributed to the current problem is our consumerist disposable society. We consume a large amount of goods, much of which is disposable thus leading to more production and more trash. On a side note we as a race have, in all likelihood, produced more garbage in the last one hundred years than we have in our entire prior history. We are passing on to future generations of humans, as well as the other species with which we live, a planet choked with garbage.
Fueling this cycle of production and consumption have been the banks that have extended credit, often irresponsibly, to the average consumer. The banks encouraged us to spend more and more, and consume more and more so that we pay them more and more interest on the revolving debt for which we are beholden to them.
The aforementioned construction industry did the same to prospective home buyers in conjunction with banks that encouraged people who were not at all able to purchase a house to do so via loans that they could not afford to pay back, and under predatory terms. The banks did this as they also had loans extended to the very construction companies who built the homes who depended on the sales of those homes in order to pay the loans to the banks to which they were beholden.
The end result is an economy with a consumer base whose wherewithal to consume has come to an end, and an industry whose means of production is dwindling. This is compounded by the failure of banks as more and more people are failing to pay the enormous debt they have taken upon themselves. This failure of banks further threatens industry as it is the bank on which industry has depended on for the capital to produce more and more.
The solution to our economic crisis will not be found in pumping money into the economy, or the regulation of banks. We need to reform the very way we do business and live our lives. We have become a society that consumes for the sake of consuming with a crack like addiction rather than consuming for the sake of survival. We need to greatly re-asses our priorities, and re-determine what is valuable to us as individuals and as a society as a whole. We need to unshackle ourselves from our addictive consumerist mentality, and from the debt of our loans.
Jefferson said in 1802, “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”
The times are ripe for change. Obama talks about change but he is as out of touch with the reality of the crisis we are dealing with and the change needed as any other politician in Washington. The time is ripe for a start of a Socialist evolution. Yes, an evolution and not a revolution. We must change our way of life from that of a consumerist society centered on private property, and greed to a more communal one that is centered on the welfare of every individual. We have the industrial means to carry this out, and we can do it. The change need be a gradual evolution as rooting out human greed is not something that will happen overnight nor something achievable by the bullet. We saw that failing in all of the Communist revolutions to date. I have faith in the human race and I know we can evolve to something better than we are today.
Are you with me?
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Hossein Ali Montazeri.
Hossein Ali Montazeri is the man that should have been the successor to Khomeini. Although he supports Khomeini concept of velayah al-faqih he is much more liberal, and conscious of the rights of individuals. He supported the formation of regulated political parties, and individuals rights to political expression.
"The denial of people's rights, injustice and disregard for the revolution's true values have delivered the most severe blows against the revolution. Before any reconstruction [takes place], there must first be a political and ideological reconstruction . . . This is something that the people expect of a leader."
Moin, Baqer (2000). Khomeini: Life of the Ayatollah. New York: Thomas Dunne Books. pp. 262
He was pushed aside from consideration as successor to Khomeini in part due to his association with Mehdi Hashemi who was responsible for leaking the Iran/Contra scandal embarrassing then President Rafsanjani. He also spoke out against Khomeini's fatwa that issued a death warrant for Solomon Rushdie and anyone who aided in the publishing of his book, "The Satanic Verses".
"People in the world are getting the idea that our business in Iran is just murdering people."
Wright, Robin B. (2000). The last great revolution : turmoil and transformation in Iran. New York: A. A. Knopf. pp. 20.
He has recently been critical of Ahmadenijad's hard line stance on the issue of nuclear power. Although he does support the development of nuclear power he is in favor of a more moderate, and conciliatory approach to the West in contrast to the belligerent, and confrontational attitude displayed by Ahmadenijad.
The Assembly of Experts, whose job it is to pick the Grand Ayatollah, has the power to dismiss him and chose another.
I think that it is high time for change in Iran. Montazeri should replace Khameini as Grand Ayatollah. Khatami, or Mousavi should replace Ahmadenijad as President.
Hamas & Fatah.
Things are getting interesting.
Iran: The Historical Key to the Mideast..
Russia has historically had its eyes on Afghanistan. An alliance between Russian and Iran would pose an interesting threat to U.S. interests in the region. This would be greatly heightened if talks between the Iraqi and Iranian governments continue, and include Iraq in the alliance.
Very interesting.
All this being said, I am very surprised that the Majles and the Council of Guardians allowed Russian involvement in the building and testing of the Nuclear facility. France, Germany, and other European countries I can understand, but Russia that has had such a bitter history with Iran.....smacks of the Mullahs loosing their revolutionary fervor, and allowing Imperialist aspirations back into the mix of things.
Every time a world power like Great Brittain, or Russian has tried to increase their influence in the Mid East inevitably Iran would be at the center of things. Iran is positioned at a very strategic point, and typically over the course of history that strategic advatage has been taken by Russia, Brittain, or the U.S. Iran was key in supplying material for Stalin's fight against the Germans. Iran almost turned the tide in the favor of the Germans in the Great War, but was invaded by Russia and England before they had the chance. Now they stand at the center of things again.
It is interesting how things repeat themselves.
The question is whether Iran will stand on its own two feet or play patsy to the Imperialists again; namely Russia in this current case.
Iran stands capable of being a world player, and upsetting the balance of power of the big three. What is yet to be seen is if they have the capability to get passed their little revolutiony fantasy of Khomeini's and become an effective political, economic, social, and military power in the region.
The Warnings We Ignored.
Lincoln 1837
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.'
Jefferson 1802

